NxruLpn

Special Master’s Opinion and Court Records Unsealed

“Today, August 10, is the seven year anniversary of the arson of my home. Should you continue to read on you will see that I am still fighting DOJ and ATF for justice and accountability.

On August 7, the United States Court of Federal Claims Special Master, the Honorable Judge John Faciolla, filed his Opinion and Order on his investigation.

172 Order re Unsealing File

The Special Master has ruled against me. In his eyes I failed in my attempt to prove that DOJ committed fraud upon the court during the trial of this lawsuit. I lost this battle.

The Special Master ordered the unsealing of certain documents related to the inquiry of alleged fraud and misconduct against Department of Justice attorneys during their defense of my allegations in the case Dobyns v. USA.  I commend him for this decision.

The documents will soon be available through the United States Court of Federal Claims; docket 1:08-cv-00700-FMA. For those who hold a Pacer account they will be published here: https://www.pacer.gov/psco/cgi-bin/courtinfo.pl?court=E_USFCC

What you are going to find is witness statements, investigative reports, DOJ’s insider emails, court filings, thousands of them.

8173541960_4b2b7b9672_z

A friend telephoned and asked me if I felt like a wounded lion.

“Yes. A bit. I’ve been wounded before. I will be fine.  A wounded lion is dangerous.”

I thought it both timely and appropriate to set the featured image (top of page) for this posting of the Swiss sculpture, the LION OF LUCERNE. It honors Swiss Guards massacred during the French Revolution – fighting, and failing – to defend a palace of great importance and to protect the people inside. They lost their battle as well.

Upon seeing it for the first time Mark Twain described “the Lion”: “His size is colossal, his attitude is noble. His head is bowed, a broken spear is sticking in his shoulder…”

Yes, that is how I feel today – noble, bowed and with a spear in my back, wounded, hurting.

You will have to wait for the Clerk of Court to publish the remainder of the unsealed file.

These are the instructions I have received:

1) The Clerk’s Office will wait to unseal any documents until August 12, 2015, when the Clerk’s Office receives defendant’s redacted versions of ECF document numbers 337, 350, 401, 342, and 342-1 on CD-ROM.

2) Once the Clerk’s Office receives the redacted versions of the documents listed above, the Clerk’s Office will upload the redacted versions to the docket. Please note that the Clerk’s office will not replace the sealed versions of these documents, but instead will file the redacted versions separately in order to preserve the official court record.

3) Finally, the Clerk’s office will unseal all other documents filed in the case from March 4, 2015, to the present except for ECF document numbers 409, 410, 425, and 428, which are to remain under seal pursuant to the Special Master’s August 7 order.

This is how it all went down. What follows are my allegations based on the evidence available to me.

IGNORED THREATS

Between 2004 and 2008 my family and I received numerous death and violence threats from criminals I had investigated who were subsequently arrested, indicted and prosecuted.

ATF failed to show any real interest in investigating these events. A few are listed here:

From ATF Report 20130060 (Robert “Mac” McKay threat):McKay

 

From Office of Inspector General Report dated September 22, 2008 (Curtis Duchette threat): Duchette

 

From Office of Inspector General Report dated September 22, 2008 (Art “Whitey” Dominquez threat): Whitey

 

From Office of Inspector General Report dated September 22, 2008 (Doug “Slut Doug” Wistrom threat): Wistrom

 

From Office of Inspector General Report dated September 22, 2008 (Robert “Chico” Mora threat): Chico

 

From intercepted jailhouse letter written by convicted Hells Angel murderer Kevin Augustiniak:Augustiniak

 

The United States Office of the Inspector General (OIG) investigated ATF’s failures to investigate or even react to these threats and countless others.

OIG Conclusions delivered to President Obama and United States Attorney Eric Holder:

OIG Conclusions

 

 

SETTLEMENT

ATF chose to hold no one accountable or enact any changes. They blamed me. I filed a complaint against ATF. I met with ATF’s #1 and #2 shotcallers; Deputy Director Ronnie Carter and Assistant Director Billy Hoover, working together we reached an out of court settlement. In doing so ATF agreed that I had been subjected to retributions through ATF’s inaction to the threats I faced.

RECALL OF BACKSTOPPING PROTECTION

Almost immediately after settling my dispute and in spite of the active threats and murder contracts, ATF made an unprecedented decision and removed every single protective measure, or “backstopping”, I had in place to defend myself; fictitious ID’s, registrations, public records, etc. They did this maliciously as a new form of “payback”. I believed the recall of my protections was ridiculous, unnecessary and very dangerous but, I choked it down, content to move forward and put the dispute behind me. ATF’s Internal Affairs Division took a harsher view of what was done.

From ATF Report 20130060:ID Withdrawl

In his published Opinion (posted below) Trial Judge, The Honorable Francis Allegra, found, “…the central conclusion of the report was that Chief Vidoli, NIBIN Chief Pugmire and SAC Newell ignored information about threats to Agent Dobyns and his family in deciding to remove the fictitious identification. And the report underscored that the removal of fictitious identification put Agent Dobyns and his family at risk.”

Vidoli walked away with a promotion courtesy of now ATF Director Thomas Brandon.

ARSON OF MY HOME

Then,

On August 10, 2008, with my private personal information now open to the public for a few months and easily accessible, my home was burned to the ground by arsonist(s). My wife and two children were inside when the fire was started. Nearly everything we owned was destroyed.Arson

Before and After

I had many enemies. There were many suspects.

At that time, Charles Higman was ATF Tucson’s Resident Agent in Charge (RAC). He prevented an immediate ATF response to the incident and then coordinated and co-orchestrated a failed attempt to frame me for the arson. He did this in spite of some of America’s top arson investigators documenting that I was not involved and ignoring the true suspects. Higman (and others) did not view those expert opinions as a deterrent in their attempt to set me up.

This situation was fast becoming an even more dangerous one than I had previously settled. Spoken and written threats had evolved into a real attack.

As background, Higman was the puppet for two ATF Phoenix Field Division managers, Special Agent in Charge (SAC) William Newell and Assistant Special Agent in Charge (ASAC) George Gillette. Newell and Gillette were later determined to be the “boots on the ground” ringleaders of ATF’s ongoing Operation Fast and Furious. Higman managed the Fast and Furious gunwalking predecessor, Operation Wide Receiver. Their track records of incompetency were both well known to ATF and extraordinarily dangerous.

Because my family was in our home when the arson occurred, the “Three Amigos” were also accusing me of being someone so despicable that I was willing to murder my own family by fire (arson of an occupied structure).

I was never the best ATF agent, the smartest or, the best person. I have many flaws. What I did do was work my ass off for my agency and spilled my own blood, gallons of it, many times. I did not deserve to be criminally set-up by the people I worked for.

Joining ATF’s corrupt mangers were Federal Bureau of Investigation Agent Brian Nowak and Assistant United States Attorney Beverly Anderson who happily participated in the effort to pin the felony on me. They were going to be the ones to bring down the guy who was appearing on television and who had written a book that was going to become a movie. For that and my whistleblowing I had become Public Enemy #1 at ATF and DOJ. The U.S. Attorney’s Office in Tucson still considers me a suspect. If they could “get” me, they would be DOJ heroes.

When I complained to ATF executives of the frame-job I was literally “taunted” into legal action. Acting ATF Director Michael Sullivan (at that time also jointly holding the position of the United States Attorney for Massachusetts) told his U.S. Attorney peer who was serving as my liaison, “Tell Jay to do what he has to do.”

I accepted the challenge and filed the lawsuit now titled Dobyns v. U.S.A. DOJ took up the defense of ATF.

INTERNAL INVESTIGATION

In 2012, a year before trial, ATF Special Agent Christopher Trainor who was assigned to ATF’s Internal Affairs Division conducted an exhaustive and comprehensive investigation of ATF’s failed reaction and response to the arson and the recall of my protective backstopping measures. He also examined ATF’s tactics to pin the crime on me.

Trainor’s report was completed and approved/sanctioned by ATF. In it, eleven conclusions of unethical and potentially criminal conduct towards me were documented citing the Three Amigos – Newell, Gillette and Higman – as the primary culprits.IAD 1

IAD 2IAD 3

I knew, ATF knew, everyone knew that Trainor had proven my allegations true. DOJ also knew what they were facing if we walked into a courtroom. They were in possession of the facts, evidence and official conclusions. Trainor had delivered those in a thorough and complete manner.

I tried to settle the lawsuit on numerous occasions. I DID NOT want to go to court. Not for fear of a loss but rather for fear that I would be responsible for further exposing how dirty ATF had become. I did not and do not view that as my responsibility to expose.

In spite of the actions taken against me, I still loved ATF and the men and women who served in the lower levels of the agency. My public statements were never designed to embarrass ATF or my peers, only to prevent any of them from ever again having to suffer under the treatment I had been subjected to by management. All of my “internal’ efforts for resolution had failed to produce a result.  Neither ATF or DOJ had provided no voice in the matter and my only hope of survival and accountability was through the media. ATF and DOJ refused to take me serious.

Each settlement attempt I made was unilaterally rejected by DOJ and ATF. During one negotiation the governments counter-offer to me was, “drop your lawsuit against us and resign from service immediately or you will be terminated.” When I rejected that bad-faith “offer” ATF Executive Ronnie Carter emailed his peers saying, “Jay thinks this is just another payday”, referencing the out of court settlement I had previously negotiated with him.

TRIAL

In the summer of 2013 DOJ forced this case to trial, five years down the road from the arson. Their goal was to humiliate me and send a message to anyone who might challenge them in the future.

The first two weeks of trial were in Tucson and after a short break, the final week was in Washington, D.C.

Newell, Gillette and Higman served as DOJ’s “star” witnesses.

During trial, DOJ attorneys tried to help both Gillett and Higman “talk off” their conspiracy to withhold critical documents that helped prove they were trying to frame me for the arson and that they were doing nothing to pursue credible suspects. The key document demonstrating their audacity, being so brazen they even wrote it down and then transmitted their plan electronically (oops, I found it) was presented at trial. Gillette sent Higman this message to bolster Higman’s confidence that they would get away with knowingly and intentionally withholding information of their attempt to frame me from ATF superiors.v_-DOJ-GIllett-email

DOJ defended this email as friendly banter between peers.

TRIAL VERDICT

The Trial Judge was the Honorable Francis Allegra. DOJ rode their trial horses, Higman and Gillette into his courtroom.

Judge Allegra wasn’t buying what DOJ was selling. On September 16, 2014, he published his trial court opinion and findings.  I won. Justice was served.

Final Redacted Opinion

220px-Francis_allegra

Judge Allegra reiterated the theme that he first announced at closing argument, that “professional jealousy” or “simply spite by certain ATF actors” motivated the governments insistence on defeating me. He also wrote that Gillette and Higman testified in a manner insulting to the law enforcement profession and embarrassing to the DOJ attorneys backing them up.

“A few words are in order regarding the credibility determinations that underlie some of the foregoing findings. In particular, the court finds significant portions of the testimony of two witnesses – Agent Charles Higman and ASAC George Gillett – unworthy of belief.”

“…Agent Higman targeted Agent Dobyns as a suspect in the arson of his home, even after highly-respected agents within the Phoenix Field Office had concluded otherwise…”

Judge Allegra characterized Higman’s trial testimony, “Agent Higman wove a remarkable tapestry of fiction concerning his response to the fire and the investigation that followed”, “Based on the roll and surge of this contrary evidence, and for other reasons (including his general demeanor and nonresponsiveness to questions), the court concluded that Agent Higman’s testimony lacked credibility.”

Judge Allegra found that Gillette was no better, “ASAC Gillett’s testimony likewise posed serious credibility issues”, “…it should not be overlooked that ASAC Gillett’s testimony was repeatedly contradicted by other witnesses and his prior depositions”, “Various emails in the record plainly demonstrate that ASAC Gillett failed to tell the truth…”

DOJ has never lifted a finger to investigate or prosecute the perjury their witnesses offered in the courtroom. Probably because their strategy had so utterly failed they wanted no more attention to it.

In a grotesque juxtaposition, during trial as DOJ embraced the Three Amigos they attempted to discredit Trainor thus reasoning that the credibility of Trainor’s investigation might crumble with him. If the impact of Trainor’s investigation could be diminished, its influence in the eyes of Judge Allegra would be damaged.

But the flaw in their strategy was that unlike DOJ’s lynchpin witnesses, Trainor’s professional history was impeccable. DOJ was willing to sacrifice Trainor’s good name and reputation to defeat me. It was disgusting to watch DOJ try to destroy a good man. This was a classic DOJ “kill the messenger” move that avoided any concern for facts and evidence.

DOJ’s trial attacks on Trainor started severely but went through the roof after he testified that the timing ATF’s decision to void the allegations of misconduct he proved against Newell and Gillette were “suspicious” (Note: Trainor’s testimony went further and was more descriptive and detailed, but remains under seal).

DOJ didn’t fool Judge Allegra, ““At the outset, it is conspicuous that the Justice Department attorneys in this case strenuously attempted to impeach Agent Trainor’s testimony – an odd tactical decision to say the least”,  “…the court attaches considerable weight to the testimony of Agent Trainor, who authored the 2012 and 2013 IAD reports.”

Judge Allegra characterized DOJ’s attempts to impeach Trainor at trial as, “More importantly though, there is every indication that Agent Trainor’s reports were thorough, well-documented and accurately reflected the substance of the more than 4,000 pages of documents, electronic messages, depositions and notes of interview that he reviewed and summarized in his two reports. Those reports, indeed, corroborate hundreds of critical facts that are otherwise reflected by the testimony and documents in the record. In general, the court was impressed with Agent Trainor’s testimony – his capabilities, knowledge of the subject matter of the investigations, general integrity and willingness to respond to the court’s questions.”

Below you will learn that DOJ went all-in to fracture Trainor’s credibility again, the next episode would come years later.

COVER-UP

Newell and Gillette were facing termination for their treatment of me when ATF’s now Director Thomas Brandon allowed Newell to remain employed with a demotion and Gillett, to retire in lieu of termination. On the stand Trainor “let slip” this dirty little secret that DOJ wanted no one to know.  Higman had bailed on his ATF career when the allegations against him began to surface so he was not subjected to termination or discipline, having already resigned.

ATF’s Director Thomas Brandon negotiated all settlements with ATF managers investigated in my case. All were given free rides including those who pulled my backstopping just before the arson. He internally cleared them of any wrongdoing mid-trial just when it looked like their ship was sinking. None were held internally or externally accountable.

THREATS TO TRAINOR

During our trial transition from Tucson to Washington, Higman, who had completed his testimony adversarial to me for the government, left a threatening voicemail on the telephone of Trainor who was scheduled to continue his testimony. Higman voiced his dissatisfaction with Trainor’s investigation. He knew Trainor had caught him dirty and with his pants down.

The same day the voicemail threats were received, Trainor discovered that his government vehicle had been vandalized with a construction cone forced into the tailpipe while parked at his residence.

Trainor reported the Higman threats to ATF investigators and mid-level managers. ATF field investigators who listened to the voicemail believed it was a threat, a serious one. ATF opened an investigation into Higman. The investigation progressed until, on the eve of interviewing Higman, ATF Headquarters Executives quickly closed it. If the governments “star” witness against me had tampered with my witness their defense of my case would be trainwrecked. ATF and DOJ did not want to prove what they knew to be true. Best way to stop that was to not interview Higman. They wouldn’t have to know the truth.

Trainor reported the threats to ATF attorney Rachael Bouman and to DOJ lead trail attorney David Harrington and his co-counsel assistant Corinne Niosi. Now knowing that ATF had no intention to conduct a complete investigation and hiding behind the white-wash dismissal of the Higman threats, Trainor documented that during a telephone call Harrington twice threatened him: should Trainor attempt to make Trial Judge Allegra aware of the threats his Justice Department career would be negatively impacted.

Facing threats to his safety and his career, Trainor continued his trial testimony in Washington. He testified accurately displaying the courage and integrity all of us expect and demand from a law enforcement officer. He did not report the threats against him at that time to Judge Allegra or anyone, including me, other than his private counsel and the trial attorneys.

Ignoring the noose around his own neck at closing argument Harrington arrogantly advised Judge Allegra that that blame for ATF’s failed arson response, “can be laid at the feet of Jay Dobyns and how he approached things”. Judge Allegra and I were still in the blind regarding the trial threats Trainor had faced.

Millions of taxpayer dollars had been spent to defeat me. DOJ’s attorneys cheated along the way. In spite of that they were unsuccessful.

APPEAL

But, not so fast.

Eric Holder’s DOJ appealed the ruling with the support and encouragement of ATF’s then Director B. Todd Jones. There was no way DOJ or ATF was going to stand for a lowly agent and his disability and construction law specialist attorney Jim Reed beating them, regardless of what verdict the trial produced. They had plenty of your tax money left in their banks to continue to fund their fight against me. They were betting that I would “tap-out” both figuratively and literally.

America, you paid for this! The joke is on you (and me).Optimized-Holder-Jones-gun-control-624x780

Ex-ATF Director Jones and Attorney General Holder

REPORTING OF THE THREATS AGAINST TRAINOR TO JUDGE ALLEGRA

After DOJ’s appeal was entered Trainor contacted Judge Allegra and advised of the threat situations he had faced during trial from both Higman and Harrington, now fourteen months past.

By then the case was held in the control of the Appellate Court. Upon learning of the new allegations Judge Allegra asked that Court return to him his trial verdict for reconsideration but, his review would only take place after an inquiry into the threats against Trainor and other allegations of trial misconduct by DOJ could be properly investigated. Judge Allegra ordered an investigation and intended to use the inquiries findings to determine if a new verdict should be issued.

DOJ tried to appeal their way out of the soon-to-follow scrutiny. They lost and the process continued.

ASSIGNMENT OF THE SPECIAL MASTER

United States Court of Federal Claims Chief Judge, the Honorable Patricia Campbell-Smith, assigned retired Unites States Magistrate, the Honorable Judge John Facciola, to direct the inquiry on the courts behalf as a Special Master.

Judge Allegra’s December 1, 2014 opinion establishing these proceedings being very specific in his order regarding what he wanted the Special Master to accomplish on his behalf.

While my interests were unquestionably injured by the misconduct that we alleged, the Court also held an interest in whether government lawyers lied to or deceived the presiding judge. In the process of protecting my rights, Jim Reed and I became the de facto ‘special prosecutors’ on behalf of the court’s interest, attempting to obtain the documents and evidence needed to prove our claims – and Judge Allegra’s stated concerns – that DOJ committed fraud and misconduct.

Still more of your tax money was committed by DOJ to defend, protect and further cover-up their bad conduct. American’s fund DOJ’s behavior. In spite of our services designed primarily to defend the integrity of Judge Allegra’s courtroom, Jim’s firm, Baird, Williams and Greer and I self-funded our efforts. The imbalance of resources was extreme but we were not shaken or discouraged.

Jim-Reed

My attorney, James B. “Jim” Reed

Over six months passed. Thousands of man-hours were dedicated to both sides of the argument. Hundreds of pages of arguments, briefs, memorandums, opinions, orders and rulings were created; some of which are on the verge of being unsealed.

One of most hard fought contentions during the case was Jim’s work to overcome DOJ’s attempts to protect critical documents we needed to discover the truth.

On June 19, 2015 Special Master Facciola ruled in my favor under his Opinion on the Deliberative Process Privilege and ordered that those dangerous documents be released to me, under seal. We were on the path to success. We were being given the ammunition needed to prove the allegations against DOJ’s attorneys and ultimately to provide Judge Allegra the information he would want to see to determine if DOJ’s attorney misconduct affected the final outcome of the trial.

REMOVAL OF JUDGE ALLEGRA

On June 23, two judicial days later, Judge Campbell-Smith “terminated” Judge Allegra from my case and reassigned it to herself as the new trial court judge. The Arizona Republic contacted the Chief Clerk of the Court of Federal Claims to determine why Judge Allegra left the case – and the court’s service. The Clerk indicated that Judge Allegra had a health disability, but offered “no comment” when asked if Judge Allegra left his position voluntarily.Smith Allegra

The Honorable Judge Patricia Campbell-Smith             The Honorable Judge Francis Allegra

Three weeks later Judge Campbell-Smith contacted U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, asking him to provide her new and additional judges sending White House nominees for the federal bench to the Senate Floor. She stated that the Court of Federal Claims had an urgent need for fill vacancies; in this context, it is regrettable that apparently Judge Allegra’s health circumstances, after seven years of handling my lawsuit and while he battled his health issues, did not allow him finish out this lawsuit in the manner in which he envisioned during these proceedings.

Fed. Claims Chief Judge Urges Congress To Fill Vacancies

Law360, Washington, July 13, 2015

The chief judge of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims urged Senate leaders on Friday to approve President Barack Obama’s nominees to the court, saying long-standing judicial vacancies have strained it.

In a four-paragraph letter, Chief Judge Patricia E. Campbell-Smith asked U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and the chairman and ranking member of the Judiciary Committee “to fill at your earliest opportunity” five vacancies on the court, which has not been fully staffed with 16 judges since February 2013. The lack of judges has not slowed the complex casework arriving before the court, Judge Campbell-Smith added.

“Despite the court’s shortage of judicial officers, our caseload continues unabated,” she wrote. “The statutory requirements dictating deadlines for certain types of cases unique to our court, including government contract disputes — some of which involve national defense and national security — remain in effect.”

The cases in the Court of Federal Claims are often for high stakes, with three current suits considering damages of at least $40 billion, Judge Campbell-Smith wrote. The dollar amounts reflect the complexity of the underlying cases, which deal with government contract disputes, tax issues, environmental regulations and Native American claims, among others, she said.

http://www.law360.com/articles/678432/fed-claims-chief-judge-urges-congress-to-fill-vacancies

ATF AND DOJ’S SELF-CREATED EVIDENCE

To support their shut-down of the ATF investigation into Higman’s threats against Trainor, ATF and DOJ trial attorneys actually crafted a declaration to the Special Master on behalf of ATF’s Assistant Director Michael Gleysteen in which they tried to explain why ATF chose not to fully investigate the Higman threats.

The trial attorneys are now known to have passed back and forth Gleysteen’s statement to the Special Master self-composing the document and adding “redline” edits to it with each exchange. The telling statement comes when one of the DOJ attorney writes, “I think this suits our needs.”

What DOJ and ATF had done (again) was to make Trainor the bad guy. They characterized him as delusional and over-reactive.  When you feel that your children are threatened, short of taking an AK to the streets, is it even possible to over react?  Does DOJ’s ‘take’ on this type of situation sound familiar?

Over a year after the threats against him had been made and passed Trainor stated that the threat was then likely a non-issue.  DOJ jumped on that position to claim there never was a threat.

DOJ argued, how could a fraud have occurred if no “real” threat ever happened?  Chris Trainor is once again victimized to beat me.  A manipulation of the facts is nothing to worry about at DOJ.

NO DEPOSITIONS ?

The newly unsealed documents will demonstrate that Special Master Facciola first ordered depositions of several DOJ attorneys and ATF Agents, and then later withdrew his order, preventing us from asking any of them questions at deposition. Higman’s and the DOJ attorneys now held the knowledge that their alleged threats to Trainor would never be questioned live and under oath in this process by Jim Reed.  Their questions and answers were all generated “in house” by their friendly and sympathetic protectors.

In denying depositions to me, in large part, the Special Master simply did not honor what Judge Allegra had intended.

The accused attorneys have retained private counsel specializing in criminal matters. They didn’t do that because they felt safe or because DOJ was intending to defend them as having acted within the ‘scope’ of their duties.

SPECIAL MASTER INQUIRY COMPLETED

In a Rule 60(c) proceeding (which we just completed), a judgment can be altered or amended if there has been a fraud upon the court, a misrepresentation or other misconduct.

The Special Master took a very narrow interpretation of that rule.

He determined that, because agent Trainor testified truthfully at trial – despite the threats and intimidation he faced from the Higman voicemail, the vandalism to his government vehicle that coincided, and, the threats he received to his career by DOJ – Judge Allegra’s verdict was not impaired and no ”qualifying” fraud occurred.

My interpretation of that decision is that in Special Master Facciola eyes, DOJ can threaten and intimidate witnesses so long as that conduct does not negatively impact their testimony. If the threatened witness does not cave in, then for Special Master Facciola – no fraud, no harm, no foul. I do not agree.

He also chose to ignore an important element of the rule – misconduct.  For his own reasons he simply was never interested in exploring DOJ misconduct. Maybe because it was so dicey and had too many of DOJ’s big names involved.  I do not know.  More on that is below.

Judge Allegra is no longer available to rule on or accept/decline whether the Special Master’s standard for fraud, quite different from his own, was acceptable. That is now up to Judge Campbell-Smith in the weeks to come.

UNSEALING OF DOCUMENTS

In a final debate DOJ argued that key documents unveiled during the Special Master investigation containing what they claimed to be “sensitive” information including the names of the accused attorneys should not be released to the public. We argued that American citizens deserved to know how their government’s Justice Department operates, how they chose to spend your tax dollars and on what.

My contention was that the very attorneys who zealously tried, and failed, to support ATF’s self-imploded claim that I was an arsonist and potential murderer – doing so unethically knowing the facts and evidence they held in their hands proved that I was not – and who had further tried their best to wreck Chris Trainor’s reputation with no regard were now concerned that their cherished reputations as DOJ attorneys and representatives of justice might be soiled if their names were made public.

Judge Facciola granted those redactions but unsealed nearly everything else.

President Obama himself supported my argument. In the first executive order he signed after assuming office he stated,

January 21, 2009, “Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies”

“A democracy requires accountability, and accountability requires transparency. As Justice Louis Brandeis wrote, “sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants.” […] In the face of doubt, openness prevails. The Government should not keep information confidential merely because public officials might be embarrassed by disclosure, because errors and failures might be revealed, or because of speculative or abstract fears. Nondisclosure should never be based on an effort to protect the personal interests of Government officials at the expense of those they are supposed to serve.”

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/FreedomofInformationAct

 ♦

HOLDER ‘LITE’

Eric Holder’s DOJ strenuously fought my case-in-chief at trial. When they lost, Eric Holder’s DOJ filed an appeal to continue the fight. Despite assuring Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Charles Grassley that she would hold every attorney accountable who engaged in misconduct during my lawsuit and “look into it”, Loretta Lynch’s DOJ fought the Special Master inquiry and the publication of the related documents.

Nothing has changed with respect to my lawsuit following the confirmation of Loretta Lynch as Attorney General – nothing. Her assurances of accountability for attorney misconduct in this case appear to have been nothing more than feeding Senator Grassley answers she believed he wanted to hear of good faith intent, offered only for the purpose of securing her Senate confirmation.

The disgrace of this lawsuit for the Justice Department and American taxpayers continues, under new – but not – different leadership. The Justice Department is a rudderless ship, and this lawsuit continues the drumbeat emerging from federal lawsuits around the country, exposing DOJ as the most unethical, corrupt and menacing law firm in the United States. DOJ is not an advocate for the American citizenry – it is a threat to them.

I often get questioned by friends on my wisdom, or lack thereof, for openly challenging the President, the AG, DOJ and Congress. “They will destroy you if you are not more careful.” My answer is simple, “I don’t give a f**k. I am already destroyed and the truth is on my side. Besides, what are they going to do? Frame me as a murderer and put me in prison.” Been there, done that with these clowns. If I see a red laser dot on my chest, they better shoot first.

I like to refer to Ms. Lynch as, Holder-Lite. This is how she is spending your money.

President Obama Announces Loretta Lynch As His Nominee For Attorney General

Outgoing AG Holder                                 Incoming AG Lynch                                 President Obama

So what? Why is this important?

It is important because of the backstory Jim and I uncovered during our investigation.

THE DOCUMENTS DON’T LIE

The ultimate supervisor for the trial attorneys and the final decision-maker regarding whether to withhold threat information from Judge Allegra was DOJ Civil Division Section Chief and attorney Jeanne Davidson. Davidson has been at DOJ for twenty-three years and is one of the most powerful attorneys at the Justice Department, in America. Davidson is presently awaiting a Senate vote to confirm her as a Federal Judge.

Main Justice

Politics, Policy and the Law

February 6, 2015

International Trade Court Nominee Advances

Justice Department veteran Jeanne Davidson nomination to be a judge on the U.S. Court of International Trade advanced Thursday when the Senate Judiciary Committee approved her by voice vote.

But Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) said he will ask Davidson to answer additional questions regarding her involvement in a controversial court case.

“I would note that unsealed court documents in the case of Dobyns vs. U.S. have prompted some questions that need to be answered,” said Grassley during the committee business meeting. “So I want to follow up with her regarding the extent of her involvement in those cases.”

http://www.mainjustice.com/2015/02/06/international-trade-court-nominee-advances/

Senator Grassley is on to something.

Jeanne-E-Davidson2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Judge Campbell-Smith presents an award to DOJ Attorney Jeanne Davidson at 2014 U.S. Court of Federal Claims conference

What is Senator Grassley curious about?

Davidson’s involvement in DOJ’s defense of my lawsuit was front, center and early on. She wrote to my attorney Jim Reed in February, 2013 that her subordinate (DOJ’s lead trial attorney David Harrington) “kept her apprised… of all matters…”

If Davidson’s statement is accurate, and I will give her the benefit of the doubt that it is, then she knew, long before trial, what Harrington knew – ATF’s Internal Affairs Division investigation conducted by Trainor – a 4,000 page report (including exhibits) had concluded – again, seven months before trial – and proved that that all of my claims of retribution and endangerment were true. She approved DOJ’s strategies and let the case go to trial.

In one of the to-be-unsealed emails, Davidson is named by another of her subordinate attorneys, a  supervisor above Harrington in the DOJ Anti-Dobyns trial team, crediting Davidson with the final and official decision not to advise Trial Judge Allegra that Higman had left a threatening voicemail on the telephone of Chris Trainor – mid trial!

Apparently when Jeanne Davidson gave the thumbs up to withhold evidence of Higman’s threatening voicemail from Judge Allegra, the DOJ trial attorneys felt “blessed” and free to obstruct justice skipping over their ethical requirement to report the threats to Judge Allegra.

Because the allegations of withholding threat information do not fit within the Special Master’s limited definition of fraud (one that Judge Allegra rejected when he established the inquiry), and because the Special Master did not consider the other portions of Rule 60 – misrepresentation and misconduct – Jeanne Davidson’s role in obstruction will not likely be subject to further investigation.

If anyone believes that DOJ’s Internal Investigators are going to properly investigate this matter then please turn around your spaceship and return to earth with me. Meanwhile, Davidson’s nomination for a federal judgeship awaits a Senate vote.

THE BACON SITUATION

At trial, the issue arose of an attempt by ATF Office of Chief Counsel attorney Valerie Bacon (who abruptly left during this lawsuit and found other employment at the Postal Authority) attempting to block ATF Phoenix’s new management team (replacing Newell and Gillette) from properly re-opening the criminal investigation into the arson of my home and conduct a legit search for the real arsonist(s). This is what ATF should have done in the first place.

Bacon telephoned and advised the two top ATF Phoenix supervisors that they should leave ATF’s arson investigation closed, because re-opening this criminal matter would damage DOJ’s defense of my allegations in civil court. This was a bad no-no.

How could DOJ defend their position that I was a suspect if the real suspect(s) were found out?

Two highly credible and highly respected ATF SAC’s – Phoenix SAC Thomas Atteberry who testified at trial, and now-ATF Miami SAC Carlos Canino, then-ASAC for Phoenix (in a sworn declaration to the Court), verified that Bacon proactively attempted to prevent their investigation and pressured them to stand down from their search for the real arsonist(s).

Judge Allegra briefly documented Bacon’s attempts to scuttle Atteberry and Canino’s righteous efforts in his Trial Opinion repeating Atteberry’s trial testimony:

“Testimony at trial indicated that Valerie Bacon, an attorney in ATF’s Office of General Counsel, attempted to convince SAC Atteberry not to reopen the arson investigation. In this regard, SAC Atteberry testified:
Q. . . . Did you get any kind of discouragement in any respect from anyone at ATF with respect to reopening this arson investigation?
A. Yes.
Q. Please explain.
A. When I was seeking guidance to reopen the investigation, I had a phone conversation with somebody from Counsel’s office in ATF headquarters.
THE COURT: Can you be more specific, Agent? Do you know who it was?
A. I believe it was Valerie Bacon.
THE COURT: All right. Proceed.
A. I had a phone conversation, and I also believe I talked to her in person one time when she was in Phoenix, and I believe during the telephone conversation she made a comment to me that if you, meaning myself, reopen the investigation that would damage our civil case.

Jim Reed had made DOJ aware of Bacon’s obstruction months before trial. My attorney put DOJ on pre-trial notice, emailing to – yep, you guessed it – Harrington twice, and including Davidson, supervising attorney Donald Kinner and now the third highest ranking DOJ attorney Stuart Delery. He could not have possibly made Bacon’s obstruction more clear.

Pre-trial Harrington emailed Davidson discussing with her Bacon’s tampering. They both knew. Neither did anything about it.

SECTION 18, UNITED STATES CODE 1001

Harrington sat in Judge Allegra’s chambers on June 17, 2013, in the middle of trial and said that he had no prior knowledge of the Bacon allegations prior to Atteberry’s trial testimony.

Hmmmmm? Problematic given the evidence in his soon to be released emails.

The matters regarding Valerie Bacon were of grave concern to Judge Allegra who expressly set forth in his instructions to the Special Master that he wanted this situation to be investigated for fraud on the court.

But, Harrington wasn’t done with his attempt at deception.

Knowing that DOJ’s Internal Affairs (Office of Professional Review [OPR]) had his back and was going to do their corrupt best to bury the Bacon obstruction, Harrington re-affirmed to federal investigators that he believed that his statements to Judge Allegra were true at the time he made them. He responded to OPR, this time in writing, going all-in on his lie.

Harrington’s emails to Davidson prove that he was familiar with the allegations about Bacon before trial. As a result of that knowledge, Harrington’s statements that he did not know were false statements made knowingly and intentionally to federal officials, i.e., to a federal judge and to federal investigative agents. He repeated his lie multiple times.

Again, DOJ did nothing. The rules that apply to ‘us’ do not apply to ‘them’.

The Justice Department – apparently because of their stature in the legal system – believes itself to be above the law and unaccountable for criminal actions. They seem to routinely “circle the wagons” internally to protect themselves, and not just in the case, but in dozens of others presently in the public eye.

As a federal agent, let me be clear about this – when you make intentional false statements to federal agents, you violate 18 USC 1001 – False Statements and Concealment. The Justice Department would like me to pretend that I don’t understand this. However, I was a criminal investigator for twenty-seven years before this case drove me from the job I loved. I encountered violations of that statute multiple times during my career while conducting investigations.

DOJ is very familiar with “1001” as well: it is the very statute DOJ is currently using to prosecute former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives Dennis Hastert.

DISREGARD FOR MISCONDUCT

Shortly after his appointment Special Master Facciola issued an order that he would not be investigating the Bacon witness tampering episode. The Special Master did not dig deep on the Trainor threats either.

The involved DOJ attorneys reported to, of course, DOJ, that they didn’t threaten Trainor. Without hearing the other side of the story, the Special Master sided with the attorneys and in essence, by doing so said that he did not believe Trainor.

This is not what Judge Allegra ordered.

With the Special Master giving the DOJ lies surrounding the Bacon situation a free pass, will AG Lynch (aka Holder-Lite) given the evidence now publicly available ensure that her own attorneys are held accountable (Harrington) to the same violations of criminal law that she does others (Hastert), as she promised Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Charles Grassley? So far, no. She hasn’t.  Laws and rules and ethics are for the other guys, not for DOJ. In their eyes they are exempt.

MY CONCERNS

Special Master Facciola’s report is final, but the process is not over. In my view, it has barely begun. A hard kick in the teeth has never stopped me yet.

Jim and I have invested our heart and resources on my behalf and on behalf of the preservation of the integrity of the courts. We view the conduct of the Justice Department as being unfaithful to America and the Constitution.

I am not a crusader or anyone’s Knight in Shining Armor. I just want truth, justice and accountability. For that I have been labeled an enemy of the state. I am in too deep to turn back now. Move forward to die tryin’.

The allegations referred for investigation (like Bacon) were largely ignored by the Special Master and the methods ordered to be used by Judge Allegra were rejected.

Special Master Facciola has made clear that he stands by his final report. I will respect that and I commend him for unsealing the documents involved and exposing his reasoning for support or, critical review. Although I disagree with his conclusions I do believe he is a man of character and transparency.

I will continue to trust the legal system and the courts. If I only backed their decisions in my favor and refused to honor those made against me I would be a hypocrite, I would be DOJ.

In this proceeding I believe that the Special Master did not follow the specific instructions he was delivered by Judge Allegra:

  • ignored the Bacon situation, including our allegations that lead trial counsel David Harrington lied about his knowledge of those events;
  • allowed DOJ to permit the accused attorneys to self-produce critical documents, with no meaningful oversight;
  • denied by ability to question those attorneys under oath and then accepted their self-preservation statements at face value, specifically on the topic of Bacon and Harrington’s threats to Trainor;
  • refused to permit me to obtain direct testimony of Christopher Trainor, and in the absence of that deposition, refused to accept the threat reports of Trainor authored;

And before reaching his conclusion on DOJ’s threats to Trainor,

  • refused to allow the deposition of retired ATF agent Daniel Machonis who was a witness to the threats against Trainor’s career. Machonis would have testified that he was present on the call as a witness when Harrington threatened Trainor’s career; a direct contradiction to DOJ’s one-sided recollection. The Special Master never gave me the chance to make that a part of the record.

Finally, I am most disturbed that the Special Master himself, in his June 19, 2015 Opinion wrote that plaintiff’s allegations, if proven, might represent the commission of a crime – Obstruction of Justice – but then immediately cut off the proceedings to rule in favor of DOJ that no fraud or misconduct occurred denying me the ability to prove it to him. I can’t wrap my brain around that one.

CONCLUSION

As I stated previous, I lost this battle.  But, am winning the war.

Battle 1: The case-in-chief at trial. DOJ – 0. Dobyns – 1.

Battle 2: DOJ’s attempt to prevent the Special Master’s investigation. DOJ – 0. Dobyns – 1.

Battle 3: The Special Master’s Fraud and Misconduct Inquiry. DOJ – 1. Dobyns – 0.

Battle 4: DOJ’s pending appeal of their loss in Battle 1: To Be Determined.

The War (my effort to expose the corruption that infects DOJ and ATF): The scorecard on this will be held by the American people whose hard earned money is collected every April 15 to pay for DOJ’s shams. Win or lose, I will not give up.

The appeal process will continue. Likely for several more years. Millions more of your dollars will be spent by DOJ in the process.

DOJ’s trial appeal is not about their loss during the case-in-chief. It is not about the $173K judgement against them. It is a personal and vindictive persecution of me. This is about a message that DOJ intends to send to all of us, whistleblower protection laws be damned – ‘You take us on, you point out our flaws, you dare make public allegations of corruption? Even when true, we will ruin and punish you to such an extent that anyone down the road who even thinks of doing the same, won’t.”

Congress is watching. To date, they appear to be OK with DOJ’s position. The Whistleblower Laws?  They are a joke. Our country is run by attorneys and even when adversarial they like each other more than they like us.

So back to my opening…

♦ ♥ ♣ ♠

DOJ has treated this situation and my life like a card game.  They think we are playing poker.

It’s not and I’m not. I am a wounded lion.

tumblr_nfvpsryIf11td37ydo1_1280

Link

055d7f658a7a138ce4c486131e91df11

For those following my war and expecting a conclusion on the government fraud allegations to be delivered today – stand by.

A thorough examination of the allegations of fraud and misconduct leveled against DOJ’s attorneys in their handling of my lawsuit remains ongoing. To date, the process has been both extreme and complex. My arguments with DOJ over their production of relevant documents can mildly be described as heated.

To get this right and to drill down for the whole truth is neither an easy nor quick undertaking. When facing DOJ you have to fight for every millimeter of progress, facts, evidence and truth. Those types of things are not the concern of DOJ or ATF. I have learned a valuable lesson in patience through all of this – one I badly needed. The truth will survive to the end, even when the evidence gets hidden.

Today, trial Judge Francis Allegra issued an Order granting a time extension to Special Master Judge John Faciolla allowing him room to properly complete his inquiry:

“On February 23, 2015, the Chief Judge appointed John Michael Facciola as a special master in this case (Doc. 334). Later that day, this court issued an order (Doc. 335) describing the procedures that govern the special master’s appointment, and requiring the special master to provide the assigned judge with a report on or before May 29, 2015. Today, Special Master Facciola filed a request for an extension of that deadline due to complicated privilege issues that have arisen in the case. Pursuant to this court’s February 23, 2015 order (Doc. 335, paragraph 23), the special master’s deadline to file his report is hereby extended to July 17, 2015.”

I am continuing to trust the judicial process as I have since my fight with ATF and DOJ began in 2005 – ten years and running. My fight has now spanned the tenure of two Presidents (George W. Bush and Barack Obama) and five Attorney Generals (John Ashcroft, Alberto Gonzales, Michael Mukasey, Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch). None have shown the integrity to deal with this in an honest or open manner.

If it takes another ten years, ultimately, the truth will see sunlight. I hope I am around for it.

When this broke bad I asked God for help. I was expecting a “K Street” law firm to rescue me. Instead He sent me James Reed, a disability rights and construction law attorney. I could not have done any better in anyone else’s hands. God’s perfect plan is demonstrated in remarkable ways. We are the Odd Couple.

The below picture (2009) demonstrates how the truth-seeking process has aggressively aged Jimmy and I. We weren’t ‘all that’ to begin with but, those who know us or see us daily will attest to how our appearances have sharply declined. It also represents one of our many victories. ATF and DOJ sued me for my book (No Angel). They lost.

I’m now uglier, wrinklier and fatter; Jim has less hair (that has not been an issue for me). We both have added physical ailments that come with long term exposure to stress, harassment and danger. I’m not looking for sympathy or concern. It is what it is. I’d do it all again. But, if anything should happen to either one of us, you will know where to start looking.

Jim-Jay

 

A development in current events makes this matter even more interesting. Yesterday an indictment of former House Speaker/Congressman Dennis Hassert was announced. One of the charges filed against him stemmed from his lying to federal agents.

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/dennis-hastert-indictment-contrasts-reputation-n366396

“Hastert, 73, was charged with one count each of structuring currency transactions to evade currency transaction reports and making a false statement to the FBI.”

Even the stories headline can be compared to my situation:

Indictment Taints Former Speaker Dennis Hastert’s ‘Clean as a Whistle’ Reputation

We want to believe our government, our Department of Justice, the leadership of our federal law enforcement agencies is ‘clean as a whistle’. They want you to believe it too. They are not.

When you lie to federal agents, when you cheat and create false documents and mischaracterize and cover up and deceive; the price to pay is heavy, regardless of who you are. Lady Justice is blind to titles, reputation, position or career.

Its called 18 U.S.C. § 1001 – or False Statements (but it goes further):

(a) . . . [W]hoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States,[ 1 ] knowingly and willfully –

(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;

(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or

(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; …shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years. The maximum fine under Section 1001 is at least $250,000 for individuals and $500,000 for corporations.

Ask Scooter Libby, Bernie Madoff, Jeffery Skilling, Martha Stuart or Rod Blagojevich if the statute is hallow or unenforceable.

For my adversaries who may read this, I am providing you the courtesy of posting this article. Take it to heart.  It is entitled How to Avoid Going to Jail under 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 for Lying to Government Agents.

http://www.wisenberglaw.com/Articles/How-to-Avoid-Going-to-Jail-under-18-U-S-C-Section-1001-for-Lying-to-Government-Agents.shtml

Uh oh!

112 Order continuing Report submission deadline

untitled3

April 19: An Untold Personal ATF Story

In the early 1990’s an extremist militia movement was flourishing in the United States – Michigan, Texas, Idaho, and Arizona were strongholds. The common denominator of core beliefs for these groups was an anti-American government sentiment, Christian identity, the mentality of a coming “doomsday” apocalypse and survivalism. These groups often used explosives, firearms and violence in the advancement of their causes – each squarely in the wheelhouse of ATF’s investigative jurisdiction.

April 19 became an important date representing the ideologies and events of those causes. For me, April 19 is a day on the calendar that holds sadness for the friends I would lose or find injured and for the other victims who would be killed and murdered on that date, but, it also represents the joy of befriending and working alongside some of the bravest ATF Agents ever to carry the badge.

A brief history.

On April 19, 1775, the opening shots are fired during battles of Lexington and Concord, the first in the American Revolution. Those first shots were fired by American militiamen.

On April 19, 1861, a mob of radicals holding a desire to succeed from the Union attacked United States Army troops as they marched through Baltimore.

On April 19, 1865, the funeral of Abraham Lincoln was held.

On April 19, 1985, ATF Agents captured and contained the Arkansas training compound of a white-supremacist group calling themselves the The Covenant, The Sword and The Arm of the Lord. The CSA held close ties to the Ku Klux Klan and the Aryan Nations. The CSA drew ATF’s direct attention based on their illegal acquisition of an anti-tank rocket and large amounts of assault weapons. Focus on the CSA increased when member Richard Snell murdered a pawn store owner believing the victim was Jewish and then later, an African American Arkansas State Trooper.

Later, during training related to survival of combat shootings, I would become friends with ATF Agent Bill Buford who led the CSA raid.

In the late 1980’s ATF surged in hiring new agents. They were men and women each young and eager to be involved in the most dangerous aspects of the job. We wanted in the mix and made up the core of our Special Response Teams (SWAT) and undercover operators, mentored by our experienced veterans. Training and working together, they would become some of my most beloved friends and trusted partners.

In 1992, in Ruby Ridge, Idaho, ATF arrested a survivalist named Randy Weaver for his possession of a sawed-off shotgun. The initial capturing of Weaver was performed using the undercover ruse of a broken down vehicle, bluffing the dangerous Weaver into assisting so the arrest could be made safely without a raid. My classmate, mentor, friend, and eventual undercover partner Steve Gunderson pulled that off without incident. Weaver was released on bail but failed to appear for his court hearings. The second attempt to capture Weaver resulted in the murder of United States Marshall William Degan, who I had met during an earlier undercover operation, and the deaths of Weaver’s wife and son.

On April 19, 1993, 51 days after ATF had attempted to raid the compound of the Branch Davidian’s in Waco, Texas, the siege ended when fire broke out during a second attempt to secure the structure and occupants. Tragically, 81 people were killed.

During the initial raid four ATF Agents and friends were murdered – Steve Willis, Robert Williams Todd McKeehan and Conway LeBleu. We were friends as a part of the same hiring and training cycles. Bill Buford was again involved, this time suffering significant gunshot injuries.

ATF Agent Pete Mastin, who had investigated my second combat shooting and with whom I had become close, was a team leader that day. On Pete’s team was ATF Agent Kenny King, yet another friend. Kenny was severely wounded in the assault suffering near-fatal gunshot wounds and falling from a roof inside the compound walls. With Kenny trapped and immobilized, Pete quickly organized a rescue party of my young peers to save him. With Pete leading the way, not a man to ask any young agent to do anything he wouldn’t first do himself; together they placed their lives in real-time risk to retrieve a fallen brother. Kenny was saved, survived by a shoestring and later recovered to lead one of the most remarkable “beating-the-odds” stories in ATF history. Heroism, loyalty, dedication and love were put on full display. My very limited involvement in the event helped me form friendships that have lasted a lifetime and set for me an example of our commitment to each other.

The event.

In 1995, a home-grown terrorist named Timothy McVeigh held a burning hatred for ATF behind the Waco and Ruby Ridge events. His mission was to identify a location for attack, one that housed ATF. A potential target he scouted was the United States Federal Building in Tucson, Arizona, where my office was located.

On April 19, 1995, having determined his prime location, McVeigh detonated a weapon of mass destruction at the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. 168 innocent American’s died that day. 19 were children. 3 were pregnant women. It was a manufactured device of scale and power that America had never seen on our own soil.

untitled2My friend, ATF Agent Luke Franey, was inside the building at the time of the bombing and somehow, both remarkably and miraculously, survived.

This date also marked the execution of the CSA’s Richard Snell for the murders he had committed.

The investigation.

ATF’s overt involvement in the bombing was clear and easily seen. ATF investigates bombs and bombings. Alongside the nation’s local, state and federal law enforcement, ATF Agents across the country mobilized chasing any lead into any cranny.

Another friend, ATF Agent Lowell Sprague (below, sunglasses) was ordered not wear his ATF raid jacket or anything identifying him as an ATF Agent as he helped lead McVeigh from the jail in Perry, Oklahoma. The FBI wanted to make sure they got all the credit. Lowell had covered me as a Sniper on many undercover operations.

images2(Of Note: Oklahoma State Trooper Charlie Hanger made the actual arrest. And, unrelated but very telling, when the first World Trade Center attack occurred, ATF Agents were slung on a makeshift rig and lowered into the deep blast seat searching for evidence. They recovered the van part that was stamped with the VIN of the bombs delivery vehicle only to lift the evidence out of the hole, hand it to waiting FBI Agents waiting in a safe and stable location and then held up for cameras to display their success, but I digress.)

Investigation into McVeigh’s co-conspirators was intense. A nationwide “all-hands-on-deck” call went out. The investigation took the umbrella operational name of OKBOMB.

Terry Nichols helped McVeigh build the bomb. Michael Fortier helped him devise the plan and scout locations. Both Nichols and Fortier were McVeigh’s Army buddies. Fortier was his roommate.

McVeigh and Fortier had lived in Kingman, located in the northwest corner of Arizona. This area, in addition to the southern tip of Nevada, was a hotbed for militia groups and training. Intelligence quickly developed that indicated McVeigh had associated with some of those groups.

The untold story.

At the time of the bombing I was working undercover in Las Vegas, a mostly uninteresting and mundane investigation into militias. Some gun and drug buys had been the result but, nothing that would raise anyone’s eyebrow. After OKBOMB, that quickly changed. The possibility that one of my targets might have been involved or have information related to the bombing became hot.

Unlike the massive blue-wave that worked in plain view to figure out the who, how and why, this covert phase of the investigation would stay quiet.

ATF Las Vegas Agents Terry Clark – the case agent, Ed Verkin – the supervisor (below), and Darrin Gil – himself a phenomenal undercover operator but unable to use that tactic on this case due to his potential previous exposure to those groups in the area, formed the core.

lv4001

 

ATF San Francisco Agents Frank Wandell and Dave Loftus were brought in for support and surveillance.

ATF Explosives legend Jerry Taylor was our device expert.

Las Vegas Metro Officers Gayland Hammack, Pat Fielding and Eric Cruse joined the team and mission.

ATF needed an undercover “hitter” for me to work alongside with. They got ATF Atlanta Agent Vince Cefalu. The first time I met Vince we were both peeing off the second story balcony of a favorite bar near our academy.

The team was set and the pace for an undercover operation was unusual. It was characterized as “urgent, as in right now!”

With that we all went to work. During the months that followed my wife became upset. Not because I was working away from home again but because our baby boy took his first steps in Tucson while I was likely sitting in some broke-dick bar trolling for terrorists.

EPSON MFP image

 

I introduced Vince to the targets I had met and we cast our nets outward. We ultimately infiltrated and joined a group calling themselves the “Nevada Volunteers”.

turner diariesThey were a hodgepodge cluster of people ranging from paramilitary types, to bikers, to the common man but all holding a shared viewpoint that a Zionist Occupational Government, or ZOG, was nearing. They feared an economic and world police takeover that would disarm the citizenry. Some stockpiled weapons. Others lined their bomb shelters with canned peas and MRE’s. Still others did both while cashing in their savings for gold coins. Their bible was the Turner Diaries, a novel describing a violent citizen revolution, government takeover, the bombing of FBI headquarters and race purification created with the extermination of Jews, gays and anyone “non-white”.

The book was found alongside McVeigh in his get-a-way car.

Vince and I dove in. Our personal base of operations – our office – was the tavern at the Glass Pool Inn just outside McCarron airport on Las Vegas Boulevard. We operated from there buying machine guns, sawed off shotguns, homemade nitroglycerin and entertained as our “friends”; anyone who hated America and wished for her destruction.

glasspoolinnlvnv_3glasspoolinnlvnv_4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We befriended “all-stars” of the movement like Johnny Bangerter, leader of the neo-Nazi’s in Utah whose plan was to turn the Zion National Park into a whites-only skinhead compound. He wore military camo that had American, Confederate and Nazi flags sewn on the breast and held a plan to assassinate Utah Senator Orrin Hatch. His bodyguards slung M-16’s on their backs. We briefly trained with Bangerter and the members of his Army of Israel.

Another high profile target we got close to was Bo Gritz, a highly decorated Special Forces vet from Vietnam and Vice-Presidential candidate running mate of Ku Klux Klan Grand Wizard David Duke.

We had the opportunity to get much closer to both but were stood down and told to “disengage the target”. When we asked if the FBI was making that call the answer was “higher”. When asked if it was Attorney General Janet Reno, the answer was the same, “even higher, and don’t ask again.” Our only conclusion was the direction was coming from the White House or CIA.

Our efforts to work on the “shotcallers” were shortstopped but it unwittingly led us to a much more dangerous target. His name was Jeffery James “J.J.” Tenpenny. Vince and I quickly abandoned JJ as his moniker and affectionately nicknamed him “The Dime.”

As it turned out The Dime was only loosely affiliated with the militia cause but was greatly inspired by their effectiveness. After buying guns and drugs from him at his home on several occasions, gaining his trust and confidence, he revealed his plan – implode three Las Vegas Casinos and brutally murder a corporate attorney. Coming from such a low-level target it was simply not believable.

The Dime explained that he had a deep-seated hatred for Steve Wynn, the Las Vegas mogul known as King of the Strip. Wynn owned and operated the Mirage, Treasure Island and Golden Nugget casinos, each an anchor and landmark representing everything Vegas. The Dime had a legal dispute the Wynn Corporation and wanted to create “Oklahoma City Part II” as a part of his payback.

But, there was an evil twist, not before Vince and I were to splash Wynn’s attorney in the face with acid and shoot her to death in front of her children as she delivered them to school. “I want those kids to see her face melt off first.”

We confronted The Dime with the senseless brutality of his proposed crimes. We tried to give him an out and call his bluff. This was so dynamic and extreme that even a hack defense attorney would have a good shot to defend his client by alleging entrapment. How would a nobody like Tenpenny ever orchestrate such a massive attack let alone ever pull it off? It had to be a scapegoat setup? That question at trial would be the first and most obvious to come.

The Dime fixed that for us. Vince asked him, “Do you realize that you are going to kill thousands of innocent people? Grandma’s and Grandpa’s and babies?”

The Dime pulled back his shirt and revealed a solid black tattoo of a heart on the left side of his chest. “You see that? That heart is black. I have a black heart and I don’t give a fuck.”

Dime 2

 

Problem one solved. He was committed and predisposed. The second problem was the one that we were sure would make his claims nothing more than street talk. How?

Tenpenny fixed that for us as well. He introduced us to an associate who held a reported degree in chemical engineering. Together they had calculated the amount of C-4 it would take to implode the casinos. Unbelievably he also had blueprint diagrams of the casinos themselves. He spread them out on a table at the Glass Pool for us to examine. Later, he walked us through the target locations and casually pointed out where the devices would be placed to create maximum structural damage. As he did I saw a toddler doing a babies “Frankenstein” style walk and thought of my boy.

The Dime sunk himself still further when he ordered the devices with specific detail.

Jerry Taylor in a mad-scientist way that only Jerry could pull off, built actual functioning devices to fit the request. One was disguised inside a picnic cooler. The other in a briefcase. Even more C-4 was provided for the third location. Each were built to be detonated using a model airplane hobbyist’s remote control and servos.

lv3002

 

The reality is that even a bomb of that power would not, in and of itself, compromise the structural integrity of a Las Vegas casino. Not to the likes of the Murrah Federal Building but, the death volume in a location of that type would be catastrophic.

To build a solid and prosecutable case the devices had to be real. No fakes. The last potential criminal defense of such an outrageous scheme would be to argue in court that although Tenpenny may have talked a good game, the actual devices he received were not real bombs and therefore had not committed a real crime. Jerry made sure they were real. No dummy bricks of plastic explosive for anything Mr. Taylor was going to put his name on.

On takedown day Vince and I delivered the bombs to Tenpenny in his darked-out garage. It was truly creepy as hell. Vince may not admit it but I know I was uncomfortable and it wasn’t the heat mirages coming off the street as we moved out of the sunlight. In near total darkness The Dime examined the devices with a flashlight. An ATF cover team make up of our ATF and Metro partners staged in the alley. This was at a time when Agents were still allowed to handle their own business without engaging a major SWAT operation to put handcuffs on a suspect. A lot of long days and nights had come to pass for this moment.

Vince was to deliver the bust signal. Because of the sensitivity of the devices and our proximity to the C-4, we didn’t wear body wires that day. A jump-over signal from our transmitter to the remote detonating servo would make sure that the only thing blown up was Tenpenny’s garage, and us.

Prominent in the news at that time was the name Joey Buttafuoco whose 16-year-old girlfriend shot his wife in the face after confronting her on their affair. The bust signal was set.

The Dime gave us the plan. He would place the devices and leave the casinos in a timed coordination with Vince and I murdering the attorney. Everything was agreed to.

Vince was determined to have Tenpenny call in his own assault. He’s crazier than most of the suspects we worked. That’s a part of what made him great. He started to light a cigarette but I waved him off, eye-shrugging at the bombs.

“Dime, what’s the name of that guy who had the affair with the little girl and then she blasted his old lady in the head?”

Tenpenny was clearly not the brightest of bulbs. “John Bobbitt.”

I tried to fix the answer for The Dime. “No that’s the guy whose wife cut his dick off and then threw it in the woods.” The Dime just couldn’t come up with the code. We could hear footsteps from the bust team approaching anxious to make the arrest and put an end to our games.

In frustration Vince gave in. “Joey Buttafuoco you idiot.” “BUTTAFUOCO!” That was all it took. Doors unhinging, glass breaking and me ready to wet myself again alongside my partner. “Please don’t detonate. Please don’t detonate.”

Moments later Tenpenny was proned out, Taylor de-activated the devices and unfortunately, The Dimes loyal and massive Rottweiler, Bear, laid dead on the driveway after attacking an Agent trying to protect his beloved master.

The subsequent search of Tennypenny’s house found a copy of the Turner Diaries in his nightstand.

Tenpenny was indicted and convicted on explosives charges. At his sentencing and in an attempt to clear his conscience when the Judge asked him if he had anything to say The Dime offered, “Your honor, I might as well get this out. I sold those guys some sawed-offs and a bunch of meth too.”

This portion of the OKBOMB story has never been fully told and it’s not fully told here. The Las Vegas media knows where their bread is buttered. The case was buried deep in the local paper and described only in minor detail.

Vegas Article

 

***

Ed Verkin received a very nice fruit and nut basket from the Wynn Corporation in gratitude.

After a cumulative years’ worth of investigation, ATF awarded Vince and I $300.00 dollar cash bonuses. $167.73 after tax and withdrawals. We were grateful and likely took our cash to a bar.

Vin and Bird in LV001

lv1001

 

***

On April 19, 2013, as ATF Agents assisted in the search for the Boston Marathon bombing suspects and worked to identify the bomb itself, bomber Tamerlan Tsarnaev was killed in a shootout with police.

 

imagesZJBPFAPM

The Death of Justice

 

The schedule for the Special Master inquiry into alleged fraud by government attorneys during Dobyns v. USA has been set.

In mid-May I will be in Washington, D.C., taking depositions of critical key witnesses. The time to expose more truths has grown close.

During the trial on my  case-in-chief, I won on the facts and evidence. DOJ and ATF’s legal counsel tried very hard to disprove the truth. But, truth-be-told (play on words)  they won as well, having defeated my claims for millions of dollars in damages.

I believed that I deserved a higher judgment, but I believed even more in the system and respected Judge Allegra’s award. I was at peace after my day in court. DOJ should have also respected the system and celebrated their financial victory. What they would have had to pay for what they did to me and my family was their equivalent of a single, lost french fry at the bottom of a Happy Meal bag. The arrogance of Eric Holder’s DOJ and ATF could not accept that.

Soon after the trial Opinion was published, the revelations of how low the governments lawyers had stooped trying for victory was exposed – which brings us to the here and now.

I intend to prove that DOJ’s attorneys were intentionally and willfully fraudulent in their conduct during the trial.  DOJ will defend that conduct and work to convince us otherwise.

Accountability is right around the corner. If I am successful, I will let it be known. If I fail, I will let that be known as well. When the details are ultimately made public it will turn your stomachs. They are not as good at cover-ups as they think they are.

If you are a ‘bettin’ man’, lay your chips on Jay Dobyns and Jim Reed. We may not get to their money but we will get to the truth and that truth is priceless.

The name of the header picture is titled: The Death of Justice

 

 

The_Seven_Bishops_Committed_to_the_Tower_in_1688_by_John_Smith

The Seven

The United States Court of Federal Claims has appointed Judge John Facciola (ret.) to serve as the Special Master to conduct the continuing investigation of fraud by government attorneys and executives during their defense against my lawsuit.

I am both pleased and excited by the appointment. Judge Facciola has an impeccable track record and I will place my faith and trust in him, just as I did Judge Allegra, to ferret out the truth. It is there somewhere. Like a gold nugget buried deep in mountain, I just have to go mine for it.

In many ways, a Special Master is the civil courts’ version of a Special Prosecutor, only more powerful and influential on the process and the outcome.

Judge Facciola will oversee and participate in this investigative process. He has been appointed to assist our trial judge, Judge Francis Allegra, so as to free Judge Allegra to continue to dedicate his attention to his judicial duties, such as conducting trials. When this post-trial proceeding is completed, Special Master Facciola will deliver his findings and recommendations to trial Judge Allegra.

A deadline for the process has been set for May 30, 2015. That date may be extended upon request by Judge Facciola and approval by Judge Allegra if deemed necessary.

Judge Allegra will then consider the results of Judge Facciola’s findings and recommendations and determine if the conduct revealed by this investigation had an impact on Judge Allegra’s final trial court opinion in my case. If yes, then Judge Allegra has the authority to issue a new, or at least supplemented trial opinion and judgment. I’m not sure exactly how that will work. This truly is groundbreaking in many ways.

Judge Facciola has determined that the details of his investigation will remain sealed during this process. Once the findings and recommendations are delivered to Judge Allegra, then Judge Allegra will determine if any documents that were protected during this special proceeding will be unsealed. I will not be able to publish any investigative details or results until a ruling to unseal has been issued.

The starting point for the investigation is this: in certain unsealed opinions, orders and memoranda filed by the parties, seven Department of Justice attorneys have been barred from submitting further filings with the court by Judge Allegra for alleged fraud on the court. To my knowledge, this is unprecedented.  I am also alleging certain ATF executives participated in the conspiracy.  Only time and further investigation will tell.

I am quite sure they are oiling the shredders and sledge hammering hard drives at ATF and DOJ right now.

Federal judges are dispassionate and carefully calibrated in what they write in their orders and opinions, because what they order has the force of law for the affected parties. They are not quick to accuse without a strong belief. Investigators and attorneys are also subjected to case law (Giglio and Henthorn cases) that require the disclosure of personnel records as related to honesty. If the outcome of this proceeding is to find fraud by DOJ attorneys, I do not know how DOJ ever again sends those particular lawyers into a courtroom to represent the United States.  They simply cannot.  But, they use lots of paperclips and staples at DOJ and someone has to count them.

We will investigate whether other attorneys beyond the seven should also ultimately be included.  In cooperation with the Court we will eventually determine who did what and who thought they could keep it secret.

I say they committed fraud and crimes, DOJ defends that they didn’t. That is why we have impartial courts.

Call it justice, karma, bad pizza – whatever you want. One thing is for sure, the accountability for their conduct will be a dish best served cold.

2408atg-w484h484-7648-all-aboard-the-hot-mess-express-tank

DOJ’s Created for Themselves a Hot Mess

On February 23, 2014, the Chief Judge presiding over the United States Court of Federal Claims, the Honorable Patricia Campbell-Smith, issued an Order naming retired Judge John Michael Facciola to serve her court as a Special Master and investigate my allegations of fraud committed by government attorneys during Dobyns v. USA.

Attached here: https___ecf cofc uscourts gov_cgi-bin_show_temp pl_file1797036-0–26619

With her Order, Judge Campbell-Smith ensured that this is no longer some type of legal sideshow. It is now confirmed as real, significant and important to all American’s. It should have been clear with Judge Allegra’s October 24, 2014 Order, having never before seen the dismissal of seven DOJ attorneys for a collective fraud on the court. Never! As in ever! As in groundbreaking! Check your history books. First time!

Now a Special Master has been appointed to investigate those attorneys.

For us laymen and non-lawyers, my understanding is that a Special Master is the civil courts version of a Special Prosecutor serving to, “…address pretrial and post-trial matters that cannot be effectively and timely addressed by the assigned judge.”

Judge Campbell-Smith describes Judge Facciola in his Special Master assignment as, “…well-versed in the law and fit to perform the duties incumbent on one standing in the place of the court.”

Attached here are some links I found to stories on Judge Facciola’s prior work and rulings. As you will see, he is not someone to be trifled with ruling behind the law and the law only, uninfluenced by politics, pressures or conventional mindsets.

    • Low-level federal judges balking at law enforcement requests for electronic evidence

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/crime/low-level-federal-judges-balking-at-law-enforcement-requests-for-electronic-evidence/2014/04/24/eec81748-c01b-11e3-b195-dd0c1174052c_story.html

    • Judge Rebukes Justice Dept. for Requesting Overly Broad Email Searches

      http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/20/us/judge-rebukes-officials-over-requests-for-broad-email-searches.html?_r=0

    • Dan Choi Trial Halted, Judge Allows “Vindictive Prosecution” Defense

      http://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/tags/john_m_facciola

  • Judge John Facciola Exposes Justice Department’s Unconstitutional Search and Seizure of Personal Email

    http://e-discoveryteam.com/2014/03/23/judge-john-facciola-exposes-justice-departments-unconstitutional-search-and-seizure-of-personal-email/

 

On the same day, the trial Judge over my case, the Honorable Francis Allegra, issued a subsequent and related order that details his guidelines and instructions for Judge Facciola in conducting the inquiry on his behalf.

Attached here: Order describing duties of special master

Judge Allegra notes that in filings he ordered, both DOJ and I did agree that a Special Master was appropriate to investigate the allegations.

Where we disagreed is that DOJ argued to strictly limit the scope of what and how the Special Master should conduct his business. DOJ didn’t want the Special Master to have much room or authority – of course doing what DOJ does – trying to handcuff the Special Master away from the facts, evidence and truth to protect their people.

I, on the other hand, argued that the Special Master should be given full reign to use all of his legal resources to undercover facts and find the truth, a.k.a. JUSTICE.

In paragraph 21 of Judge Allegra’s Order he states, “The special master [Facciola] will make findings assisting the assigned judge [Allegra] in determining whether defendant’s attorneys, in the conduct of this case, effectuated a fraud upon the court under RCFC 60(d)(3). As may be necessary, the special master may also consider whether there are other grounds for relief from a final judgment in this case under RCFC 60, including the existence of fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party under RCFC 60(b)(3).”

And in paragraph 22 of his Order Judge Allegra authorizes the Special Master to, “address post-trial matters in this case, preside over evidentiary proceedings relating to this case, and make findings of fact”; and to, “gather evidence to include: documents of all forms (including all forms of electronically store information (ESI)); audio recordings; the taking of oral or video depositions, to include the depositions of any attorney, other government officer or other individuals subject to this order; and the taking of oral testimony.”

I am very pleased with paragraph 24, “Proceedings in this matter shall not be sealed, except as provided by RCFC 5.2 and Appendix E.”

So,

What that all means is that Special Master Facciola can use his discretion and diligence to chase facts and evidence as he sees fit. He can take sworn depositions (and “compel”, or order if neccessary) of those with knowledge of, or involvement in the frauds and issue sanctions upon those who refuse to cooperate.

So,

These Judges are not playing around.  They take unethical conduct in their courtrooms as dead serious.

If ATF and DOJ did nothing wrong (big “If”), there should be nothing for them to hide from, dodge or cover-up. Right?

“If” they acted properly then they should actually be anxious and excited for a full and transparent investigation and opportunity to clear their names and reputations. They should be begging to testify and under oath tell the world that they did not act criminally. They should be ready, willing and able to prove that. Right?  After all, DOJ is claiming my allegations are baseless.  They should be fully cooperating and giving the Special Master everything he requests with no push-back.

In his first official act as President, Obama stated that he intended to make his administration the very most transparent in American history.  Now is a good time to start.

– For the record:

I made allegations of corruption in 2005 and 2006 that ATF dismissed as baseless. They were proven true and ATF settled out of court.

From 2007 to 2013 I made allegations of corruption that ATF and DOJ dismissed as baseless and then attempted to defend. They were proven true at trial.

I have now made allegations of Fraud committed on the court by ATF and DOJ attorneys; Obstruction of Justice, the Encouragement, Protection and Harboring of Perjury, Knowing and Intentional Misrepresentations of Facts and Evidence, and, Tampering, Threats and Intimidation of my witnesses. ATF and DOJ have deemed these baseless.  Go figure.

DOJ and ATF attorneys and executes knowingly, willingly and intentionally violated my civil rights by damaging my right to due process and a fair trial.  Pretty sure none of the activists will take this up but, oh well.

Both myself and ATF/DOJ have established a pattern and practice of for our individual conduct and honesty here. Me, in reporting criminal conduct and ATF/DOJ in denying and defending it.

Who do you want to bet is telling the truth? Who has the proven track record? Who has the motivation to lie, embellish, mischaracterize and fabricate excuses?

Remember, this was done last August. I was content. ATF and DOJ chose to continue the fight, not me.

If (or more accurately, when) my allegations are proven they could lead to prosecutions, convictions and potentially, incarcerations. They are career enders. Disbarments. Felonies.  This is not what I wanted but again, they picked the fight.  I’m ending it.  The rules of the street apply here.

Attorney General candidate Loretta Lynch has already been questioned by the Senate on these matters. She vowed to run DOJ correctly. I believe her.

Obama’s and DOJ’s nominee for a federal judgeship, Jeanne Davidson – a ringleader of the frauds and documented defender of those who enacted them – has already had her confirmation vote held from the floor of the Senate until she answer questions on her involvement. Let’s see what she says.

How much embarrassment and battle damage is DOJ and ATF going to subject themselves to in order to defend as false what they know to be true?  How many people are they going to sacrifice?   Over me?  Are you serious?

If I’ve said it once I’ve said it a thousand times, I am not going away.  This is going to get much worse before it gets better and I will expose the corruption I’ve faced or die trying. I’ve been taking my vitamins and doing burpees to get ready.

When will they learn that I don’t bluff?

There is only one way to minimize the damage to ATF and DOJ and begin the process of repair, healing and a restoration of trust.

I am calling for the resignations of ATF Director B. Todd Jones and ATF Deputy Director Thomas Brandon. They have known the truth all along, had it internally proven to them, day one, ground floor, held it in their hands, and have sat silently by as gutless lawmen (the term “lawmen” used loosely here) watching corruption fester under them.  They protected the guilty.  If you carry a badge and a gun you can’t be afraid to do what is right, you just can’t.

I am calling for the resignation of the government attorneys who perpetrated the frauds, those attorneys and executives who ordered them, and for those who were aware the frauds as officers of the court and/or law enforcement executives, did nothing to prevent them from happening or report them after they knew what occurred.

What I expect over the next couple of months is nothing of the sort to take place. I predict DOJ and ATF will lie, cheat, steal and cover-up, protect and defend their criminal conduct using every single legal and illegal tactic imaginable to hinder the truth from being exposed.

I am placing my bet on Judges Campbell-Smith, Facciola and Allegra to figure it all out.

Attached here is some early reporting on the developments by Paul Giblin at the Arizona Republic newspaper:

Judge’s aide in ATF inquest challenged government before

http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/arizona/investigations/2015/02/23/judges-aide-atf-inquest-challenged-government/23918485/

doj_holder-thumb-640xauto-3787

Should Jeanne Davidson Be A Federal Judge?

Can you say “Special Prosecutor”?

Yesterday Senator Charles Grassley initiated the vetting procedures for Ms. Jeanne Davidson, President Obama’s and DOJ’s nominee for a Federal Judgeship.

Ms. Davidson was the ringleader for the attorneys who were representing DOJ in defense of my allegations during Dobyns v. USA.  They lost.  Under the unwatchful eye of Ms. Davidson and in a Federal courtroom those attorneys lied, cheated, withheld evidence, misrepresented and mischaracterized facts, defended, promoted and protected perjury and obstruction of justice and tampered with witnesses – i.e. FRAUD! – also known as attorney misconduct and corruption of the justice system.

02-05-15 Grassley Statement

Senator Grassley’s statement on the meeting contained the following:

I believe both the Davidson and Botticelli nominations can be voice voted.
However, before we vote on the Davidson nomination, I wanted to note that recently unsealed
court documents in the case of Dobyns v. United States have prompted some questions that needto be answered. I want to follow up with her regarding the extent of her involvement in the case.
So we’ll report her out today, but I’ll be sending her some additional questions that will need tobe answered before her nomination is considered on the floor.

 

If Ms. Davidson did nothing wrong then she should be confirmed.  If she did have a hand in the fraud then she doesn’t deserve to be a Federal Judge.  Simple as that.  I know this, personally I would not trust her answers and would want to go beyond what she submits to test her credibility.  A person being awarded a Federal Judgeship must be held to a standard of full transparency, accountability and honesty.  I trust that Senator Grassley will get to the rock bottom truth.

My attorney contacted Ms. Davidson before trial began with allegations of fraudulent conduct by the DOJ attorneys Ms. Davidson was supervising.  Some of those allegations of Fraud have now been exposed by the Judge in my case and made public.  They are serious.  Never before have seven DOJ attorneys collectively been dismissed from an active litigation they were leading.  Then again, never before has a Cabinet member been held in Contempt of Congress.  Holder and crew continue to set new low-ball standards of ineptitude.

Five months before my trial even started Ms. Davidson fluffed off the allegations with a typical, condescending DOJ how-dare-you-challenge-us tone as “unfounded”, “without merit”, and that, “no inappropriate conduct has occurred”.  She takes personal ownership of the issues reaffirming that she was “appropriately apprised” of what was taking place.

She added security for her claims by vouching for her attorneys and their credibility and – wait for it – discussing their conduct with DOJ “officials”.  What officials?  Who else at DOJ, above her knew about those shenanigans?

Ms. Davidson was either A) asleep at the wheel, B) covering up the actions of her subordinates, C) protecting fraud, or D) all of the above.  She needs to explain the who, what, when, where, why and how she arrived at such a powerful, confident and denying response to real and true allegations of DOJ corruption.

Who knew?   When did they know?  What did they do about it?

Is Jeanne Davidson the type of person who should be a Federal Judge?  Do you want her administering the laws of the land?

13-0208 Jeanne Davidson – Re Dobyns (3)

Dear Mr. Reed,

This letter responds to your various email communications alleging improprieties by David Harrington, counsel of record for the United States in this matter.  I have reviewed your email messages, correspondence, pretrial materials and other documents including the recording of the early meeting of counsel and the report of investigation in the pending personnel action.  Additionally, I have met with Mr. Harrington, as well and Donald Kinner (the immediate supervisor on the case) and Corinne Niosi (trial attorney assisting with the case).  Because we take seriously any allegation of potential impropriety, however unfounded, I have considered your complaints and discussed them with officials within the Civil Division.

Mr. Harrington is a senior trial counsel who has handled numerous complex matters throughout his tenure at the Department.  He is particularly experienced in Court of Federal Claims rules and procedures.  Mr. Harrington has always kept his supervisors appropriately apprised about case developments and has earned the respect of his supervisors, peers and Judges for his professionalism, preparation and judgement.  Based on my review as described above, I believe that your complaints are without merit and that no inappropriate conduct has occurred.